Rabbit genetics are more useful when the evidence stays attached to the rabbit.
A rabbit's colour can tell you something about their genetics.
It cannot tell you everything.
BunnyBuddyHQ's genetics approach is designed to keep what is known, what is supported, what is possible and what is still unknown separate — instead of filling every blank with a guess.
What you can see on the rabbit matters.
So do:
• their parents
• their offspring
• known genetic tests
• breeder observations
• pedigree relationships
• other evidence attached to that rabbit
BunnyBuddyHQ keeps phenotype and genotype distinct.
A recorded colour may support part of a genotype without proving every hidden allele the rabbit carries.
An incomplete genotype is not a bad record.
It is a more honest record than pretending an unknown allele has been proved.
BunnyBuddyHQ's evidence-aware approach is designed to distinguish:
• confirmed or strongly supported findings
• possibilities that remain open
• constraints created by parents or offspring
• contradictions that need review
• information that simply is not known yet
As new evidence appears, the genetic picture can become more specific without rewriting the rabbit's history as though the answer had always been known.
This is not intended to be a disconnected calculator where a breeder types two colours, gets a prediction and loses the reasoning.
The genetics experience lives with the Rabbit Profile and the rabbit's relationships.
That means useful evidence can remain tied to:
• the individual rabbit
• their recorded phenotype
• parents and offspring
• breeding outcomes
• breeder observations
• approved genetics/reference evidence
BunnyBuddyHQ's first evidence-aware genetics tranche is live.
The current product can support the released Rabbit Profile genetics experience and preserve evidence/uncertainty according to the current Production implementation.
BunnyBuddyHQ's evidence-aware genetics model lets breeders record and review meaningful carrier states such as Vienna carrier or chocolate carrier, without reducing them to a free-floating profile tag.
Carrier state stays separate from phenotype/colour/pattern and uses governed evidence/confidence such as:
• Confirmed
• Probable
• Possible
Evidence can come from genetic tests, known parent/genotype information, offspring/test breeding, pedigree/family evidence, phenotype/inheritance inference or breeder-entered evidence with provenance.
Contradictory evidence remains visible for review rather than being silently overwritten.
BunnyBuddyHQ's evidence-aware genetics foundation now includes:
• stronger C-locus handling for Seal/Sable/shaded families
• additional colour-reference rows and evidence/readiness metadata
• contextual colour aliases so regional/registry terms can resolve to the same underlying colour where appropriate
• additional loci including Du, Si, W and P plus expanded Vienna handling
• kit-stage colour-development reference data
• stronger ARBA/BRC/ANRCI-aware colour presentation
It all follows the same evidence-first rules as the rest of the genetics experience: more useful colour evidence, without pretending an unknown allele is known.
Rabbit people in different countries, registries and breed communities can use different names for the same or closely related colours — and sometimes the same word can mean different things in different contexts.
BunnyBuddyHQ should preserve those differences rather than flattening them into one invented universal vocabulary.
Examples include regional and registry-aware naming such as:
• Iron Grey / Sallander context
• Sooty Fawn / Black Tort context
• Beige / Blue Tort context
• registry-specific colour/variety terminology
Where an alternate term is contextual rather than truly identical, BunnyBuddyHQ should say so.
The initial customer-facing registry set is intentionally bounded to ARBA · BRC · ANRCI. These cover the three major standards contexts BunnyBuddyHQ is currently designing around.
BunnyBuddyHQ should not present itself as the standards authority. It should identify which recognised standard context a colour/variety comes from.
Examples of the intended display pattern include:
• Black Self (ARBA / BRC / ANRCI) where recognised across all three
• [Colour/Pattern] (ARBA) where recognition is ARBA-specific
• [Colour/Pattern] (BRC / ANRCI) where those standards apply
Where the registries use different official names, BunnyBuddyHQ should preserve the registry-specific term rather than pretending one is universally correct.
Show breeders what is relevant to their standard
The approved standards direction is that a breeder's selected registry context should control which recognised colours/patterns are presented as recognised for that standard.
A breeder using ARBA should not be told that every BRC- or ANRCI-only variety is an ARBA-recognised variety. Likewise for BRC and ANRCI.
Colours/patterns that are recognised across multiple systems can show the applicable standards together.
A rabbit colour can be genetically real even if a particular show standard does not recognise it for that breed.
BunnyBuddyHQ should not call a genuine colour “invalid” simply because it is not recognised in one registry/breed context.
The product should distinguish:
• what the rabbit appears to be
• what the genetics/evidence supports
• what a particular registry recognises for the breed
Those are different questions.
Alternate names should help, not erase context
The approved product direction is one underlying colour identity with contextual alternate names where appropriate.
A breeder searching a familiar regional term should be able to find the right colour without BunnyBuddyHQ creating duplicate biological identities simply because the label differs.
BunnyBuddyHQ shows the alternate names and their context rather than silently swapping one term for another. Contextual alternate names and search are part of the colour & genetics intelligence now in BunnyBuddyHQ.
• Treat phenotype as proof of a complete genotype.
• Invent an unknown allele because the screen looks cleaner with every box filled.
• Change historical evidence silently.
• Collapse ARBA, BRC and ANRCI into one false universal standard.
• Call a genuine colour biologically invalid merely because a show standard does not recognise it.
• Present a prediction as certainty when the evidence only supports possibility.
• Ignore contradictions from parentage or offspring.
Some visitors are simply asking:
What colour is my rabbit?
That is a different question from a full breeder genetics investigation — and you don't need breeder-level genetics terminology to start. The deeper detail is here for when the question becomes about inheritance, hidden alleles or breeding evidence.
The breeder value is not “BunnyBuddyHQ guesses the litter for you.”
It is having a clearer evidence trail around the rabbits you are actually breeding.
Over time that can help a breeder understand:
• which outcomes are supported by current parental evidence
• which hidden alleles are still possible
• what offspring have ruled in or ruled out
• where a recorded phenotype conflicts with the current genetic evidence
• which terminology/recognition applies in the breeder's chosen standards context
© 2026 BunnyBuddyHQ. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions
Every rabbit has a story worth keeping